Jump to content

Infant baptism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A priest pours water on the head of an infant held over the baptismal font in a Catholic Church (United States) "The Rite of Baptism for Children" ceremony

Infant baptism, also known as paedobaptism, is a Christian sacramental practice of baptizing infants and young children. Such practice is done in the Roman Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, and various Protestant denominations, including Methodists, Presbyterians, Lutherans, and Anglicans.[1][2] The practice involves baptizing infants born to believing parents as a means of initiating them into the Christian faith. Supporters of infant baptism cite biblical references to the baptism of entire households in the New Testament, as well as Jesus’ teachings on welcoming children, as justification for this approach.[1]

In contrast, believers' baptism (credobaptism) is based on the premise that baptism should be administered only to individuals who can personally profess their faith. Those who support this view argue that baptism is a conscious act of commitment to Christianity, requiring an understanding of its significance. As a result, they maintain that only those capable of articulating their belief should participate in the sacrament. This perspective is commonly held by Baptists, Pentecostals, and other evangelical groups. Proponents of believers’ baptism argue that the absence of explicit references to infant baptism in the New Testament, along with the significance of baptism as a personal commitment.[1]

Age

[edit]

Infant baptism practices vary across Christian denominations, typically occurring within the first few weeks after birth, though some traditions perform it immediately, such as in cases of imminent death, or delay it by several months.

  • In the Roman Catholic tradition, baptism is recommended within the first few weeks, or without delay if the infant is in danger of death, as outlined in the Code of Canon Law (867 §1-§2), with parents responsible for arranging the sacrament.[3]
  • The Eastern Orthodox Church baptizes infants soon after birth, granting full sacramental participation, including Communion, to affirm their spiritual dignity and incorporation into the church.[4]
  • Lutheran churches view baptism as a sacrament of grace that forgives original sin, citing God’s initiative and rejecting the concept of an “age of accountability,” typically performing it without delay.[5]
  • In the Anglican tradition, baptism, or christening, has no age restriction and signifies inclusion in the covenant community, with parents pledging to raise the child in faith until personal confirmation.[6][7]
  • The Reformed tradition, grounded in covenant theology where baptism replaces circumcision, usually administers the sacrament within the first week, as noted in the Westminster Confession.[8]
  • Methodists practice baptism at any age, and for infants, it represents prevenient grace, with the congregation and parents committing to the child’s spiritual upbringing.[9]

Ceremony

[edit]

The exact details of the baptismal ceremony vary among Christian denominations. Many follow a prepared ceremony, called a rite or liturgy.

Reception

[edit]

All traditions begin with the reception or presentation of candidates. In the Roman Catholic Rite of Baptism for Several Children, this includes the Reception of the Children and a Liturgy of the Word with Scripture readings, homily, and intercessions. Similarly, Episcopal and Lutheran rites open with the Presentation and Examination of Candidates, including questions to parents, sponsors, or godparents. This phase highlights communal recognition and prepares candidates (and their families) for baptism.[10] In the Eastern Orthodox Church, the rite opens with the "reception of the catechumens," where the celebrant prays for the candidate to become “a reason-endowed sheep in the holy flock of your Christ, an honorable member of your Church, a child of the light, and an heir of your Kingdom.”[11]

Prayer & anointment

[edit]

Prayers and symbolic anointings mark spiritual preparation. The Roman Catholic rite includes a Prayer of Exorcism and Anointing before Baptism, emphasizing purification. Episcopal and Lutheran traditions incorporate Prayers for the Candidates and, in Lutheranism, a Prayer of the Church invoking the Holy Spirit. While explicit anointing is more prominent in Catholicism (e.g., post-baptismal chrismation), all rites emphasize prayer as a means of spiritual strengthening.[10] In the Eastern Orthodox rite, multiple exorcisms are performed, and prayers are made for the water to be “the water of redemption, the water of sanctification, the purification of flesh and spirit, the loosing of bonds, the remission of sins, the illumination of the soul, the laver of regeneration, the renewal of the spirit, the gift of adoption to sonship, the garment of incorruption, the fountain of life.”[11]

Blessing of water & baptism

[edit]

The blessing of water and baptism proper are central to all rites. Roman Catholics perform a Blessing and Invocation of God over Baptismal Water, while Episcopalians and Lutherans include a Thanksgiving over the Water. Baptism itself is administered using the Trinitarian formula: Catholics, Episcopalians, and Lutherans all employ immersion or pouring “in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.”[10] In the Eastern Orthodox Church, the celebrant prays for the water to be sanctified with “the power (energeia) of the Holy Spirit,” and the baptism is performed by triple immersion, immediately followed by Chrismation (anointing with holy oil).[11]

Explanatory rites & seal of the spirit

[edit]

Post-baptismal rituals symbolize the candidate’s new identity. Roman Catholics include Explanatory Rites: anointing with chrism (Seal of the Spirit), clothing in a white garment, presentation of a lighted candle, and the Ephphetha prayer. Episcopalians offer a Prayer for the Sevenfold Gift of the Holy Spirit, while Lutherans seal the candidate with a Prayer of the Church and present a baptismal candle.[10] Eastern Orthodox Christians, after baptism, immediately chrismate the newly baptized, praying that the newly illumined will “please you in every deed and word, and may be a child and heir of your heavenly kingdom,” affirming a twofold transformation: normative membership in the Church and acquisition of the “regenerate states” (purification, sanctification, illumination, regeneration).[11] These rites signify the Holy Spirit’s indwelling and the community’s welcome.

Conclusion

[edit]

While baptism itself does not always include Eucharist, its communal context often ties to Eucharistic worship. For example: Roman Catholics conclude with the Lord’s Prayer and a blessing, linking baptism to the broader liturgical life of the Church. Lutherans use a Baptismal Welcome, where the congregation affirms the newly baptized, often within a Eucharistic service. Episcopalians integrate baptism into the Baptismal Covenant, aligning it with congregational vows that precede shared Eucharist.[10] In the Eastern Orthodox Church, baptism, chrismation, and first communion are typically administered together, even to infants, as baptism is seen as full incorporation into the Church’s life, granting immediate access to the sacraments.[11] Though not explicitly part of the baptismal rubric in all traditions, baptism is understood as initiation into a Eucharistic community.[10]

Historical development

[edit]

First century

[edit]

First-century Christian baptism primarily involved adult believers, with no definitive New Testament evidence for infant baptism, though some suggest household baptisms may have included infants.[12][13][14][15] Scholarly consensus holds that infant baptism emerged gradually from the late 2nd century, became widespread by the 3rd century, and was universal by the 4th-5th centuries, coexisting with believers' baptism (Acts of the Apostles 2:38–41) amid early debates.[16][17][18][19][20][21]

Historian David F. Wright (2007,2005), suggests that first-century Pauline churches did not practice infant baptism. Wright describes the issue as "obscurity unresolved," noting that evidence suggests children of baptized Christians were typically not baptized until at least c. 55 AD, during Paul's ministry, though the extent of this practice remains unclear.[22][23]

Despite this, some theologians argue for the early presence of infant baptism. Joachim Jeremias (2004) and William A. Strange (1996) argue that infant baptism originated in the Apostolic Age, asserting that children of converts were baptized alongside their families.[24][25] Advocates cite households baptisms within Acts of the Apostles (16:15, 33) and 1 Corinthians 1:16 as potential evidence. However, the Global Dictionary of Theology (2009) acknowledges the ambiguity of these accounts, stating that while infants may have been included, the texts do not provide explicit confirmation.[26] Jeremias argues that baptism extended to all household members because the Old Testament concept of “household” is inherently inclusive, drawing upon interpretations of 1 Samuel 22:16–19 and Genesis 17:23.[25] Therefore, the term "house" (oikos) has been central to this debate.[27]

Steven Nicoletti (2015), proposes that the New Testament’s silence on infant baptism may affirm its practice, drawing on the concept of “presupposition pools”—shared assumptions of the time. They argue that early Christian texts likely omitted explicit mention of infant baptism because it was widely accepted, mirroring cultural norms where infants were naturally included in religious rites.[20]

Another line of reasoning explores parallels with Jewish traditions. The analogy between circumcision and baptism is a key argument for early infant baptism. In Jewish tradition, boys were circumcised on the eighth day, and some scholars suggest early Jewish Christians viewed baptism similarly.[27] Additionally, Jewish proselyte baptism included entire households, including children, as a purification rite for Gentile converts to Judaism.[28] Theologian Kurt Aland (2004) counters that this was not standard for Jewish-born children, who were typically incorporated via circumcision, not baptism, weakening the parallel to Christian practice.[29]

Further insight comes from early Christian texts addressing the sinfulness of infants or young children. Clement of Rome (1 Clement 14.4) stated, "No one is clean from defilement, not even if his life be but one day old." Although later used out of context, this became a proof-text for baptism addressing original sin.[23] This view aligns with Psalm 51:5, which states, "Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me," supporting the early Christian belief in humanity’s inherent sinfulness from birth.[30] Similarly, the Didache, a church order dated to the late 1st or early 2nd century, provides instructions for adult baptism but notes that children should receive teaching to prevent future sin, without explicitly addressing their baptism.[31] Early 1st-century Christian texts, like 1 Clement and Psalm 51:5, highlight universal sinfulness, linking baptism to sin’s remission and laying groundwork for the doctrine of original sin, later justifying infant baptism. Yet, direct evidence for the practice in this period is absent, leaving its prevalence uncertain.[32]

Second century

[edit]

Most of second-century Christian texts provide no explicit evidence for the practice of infant baptism.[26][27] However, scholars like Wright and Aland identify literary traces emerging by the late second century.[33][22][27] For example, the first clear reference to infant baptism comes from Tertullian, who opposed it or advocated for its delay. In On Baptism (c. 200 AD), he acknowledges it as an established custom but argues against it, suggesting that baptism should be delayed until individuals can personally profess faith.[34] Strange (1996) observed that Tertullian’s opposition to infant baptism marked a departure from prevailing practice, arguing that patristic evidence suggests it was already a recognized norm.[24] Additionally, Nuh Yilmaz (2020) notes that Tertullian's view did not resonate effectively in North African churches, where infant baptism continued as the general practice.[35] North Africa remained the region with the strongest support for infant baptism, and according to Ferguson (1999) it may well have been where the practice originated.[34]

Tertullian (c. 160–220 AD) opposed infant baptism in his writings, provides the first clear evidence of its practice in early North African Christianity

Additionally, some advocates cite Irenaeus of Lyon who wrote that "infants, small children, youngsters, youths, and old folk" are "born again".[26] Scholars such as Odd Magne Bakke (2005) and David P. Nelson (1996) interpret this as a reference to baptism, though Bakke qualifies that "reborn" (renascuntur) must be understood as a technical term for baptism.[36][27][27] Conversely, Peter Jenson (2012) and Robert L. Meyers (1988) argue that the statement lacks specificity regarding infants.[37][38]

Regardless, Christianity was growing in popularity and expansion during this period, structured catechesis became essential to prepare converts for faith amid persecution and heresies. This formalized approach to baptism, emphasizing instruction, according to Nelson (1996) likely reduced the practice of infant baptism, which required no prior preparation.[36]

Insights into early Christian apologists viewed infants and young children as sinless or morally innocent. Notable examples include:The Shepherd of Hermas (c. 100–150 AD) which portrays children as models of discipleship and moral purity, inherently innocent and free of evil, serving as an example for believers.[23][39] Aristides of Athens (Apology, Chapter 15, c. 125 AD) wrote that Christian children are born sinless and, if they die in infancy, are celebrated for passing from life without sin: “And when a child is born to one of them, the Christians give thanks to God; and if the child dies in infancy, they give thanks even more, for it has passed from this life sinless.”[40] Athenagoras of Athens (On the Resurrection of the Dead, c. 177 AD): stated that infants who die are not judged, as they "have done neither evil nor good."[40] Justin Martyr (First Apology, 15, c. 155 AD; Second Apology, 10, c. 153 AD) described infants and children as morally neutral, sinless until they can rationally choose to sin, emphasizing free will and the "seed of the Logos." He praised the purity of "disciples from childhood," suggesting no innate sinfulness.[41]

Third century

[edit]

Clearer evidence of infant baptism emerges in the third century.[33] Yet from the third to the early fifth century, many Christian parents postponed baptizing their children.[42] This delay was due to several factors: (1) the belief that waiting maximized baptism's spiritual benefits, (2) the custom of performing baptism only when death was near, (3) and the reluctance of unbaptized parents to have their children baptized.[38]

Despite this, inscriptions such as from Rome’s Catacomb of Priscilla mentions an infant who had received baptism before passing away. Such inscriptions suggest that infant baptism was practiced regularly, especially in cases of illness or impending death (Emergency baptism).[38] Scholars like Jeremias and Ferguson examined inscriptional evidence related to infant baptism, Aland argued that third-century inscriptions offered no significant new information. By that period, infant baptism was already well attested in existing literary sources.[43]

These existing literary sources included: Hippolytus of Rome (Apostolic Tradition 21.3-5) directed: “The little children shall be baptized first. If they can speak for themselves, let them do so; otherwise, their parents or a relative should answer on their behalf.”[34] Origen claimed that infant baptism was an apostolic tradition passed down to the Church, though it remains uncertain whether his view stemmed from theological reasoning or scriptural exegesis.[34] Regardless, his writings attests that the custom was already firmly rooted.[38] Cyprian of Carthage further insisted that baptism should not be postponed, even for infants, asserting that God’s grace is "not given in greater or lesser measure based on the recipient’s age."[38]

Fourth century

[edit]

The fourth century marked a turning point for Christianity as it transitioned from persecution to a favored religion within the Roman Empire. This shift brought about divergent baptismal practices. In some areas, the longstanding catechumenate persisted, with rigorous pre-baptismal instruction exemplified by figures like Cyril of Jerusalem and Gregory of Nyssa. Simultaneously, infant baptism gained prominence, fueled by evolving theological understandings of original sin's implications.[44]

During this period, the Church strongly condemned Pelagianism, which questioned the necessity of baptism for salvation, and affirmed that baptism must be administered without delay. For example, official decrees such as the Council of Florence’s Pro Jacobitis warned against postponing baptism, thereby underlining that infants (and others) must receive baptism promptly to secure salvation. These developments, along with texts from the Council of Carthage and the Roman Catechism that taught unbaptized infants could not attain heaven, demonstrate that by the end of the fourth century infant baptism was a widely accepted and normative practice in the Church.[45]

Several prominent Christian leaders, such as Tertullian, Rufinus, Gregory of Nazianzus, Basil of Caesarea, Ambrose, Jerome, Augustine, and Cyril of Alexandria, attest to the widespread practice of infant dedication or enrollment in the catechumenate rather than immediate baptism. This custom was observed across major Christian centers, from Carthage and Milan to Constantinople and Alexandria. Consequently, in the fourth century, dedicating infants and later instructing them in the catechumenate remained the normative practice, while infant baptism was generally administered only in cases of urgent necessity (emergency baptism).[42]

St. Augustine of Hippo being baptized in 387 AD

According to Andrew Messmer (2022), many prominent Christian leaders, though born into Christian families, were not baptized as infants but received it later in life. For instance, Novatian (200–258) was only baptized during a grave illness, while Gregory of Nazianzus (c. 329–390) waited until around age thirty. Basil of Caesarea was baptized at approximately 27 (c. 357), and Gregory of Nyssa between ages 23 and 28. Ambrose of Milan (340–397) remained unbaptized until his sudden election as bishop in 374, and John Chrysostom (347–407) was baptized around age 20 (c. 368). Jerome (347–420) received baptism at 19 (366), and Augustine (354–430), despite his devout mother Monica’s influence, delayed his baptism until age 33 (387). This pattern reflects the widespread practice of delaying baptism, even among those raised in Christian households.[42]

Regarding their views, the early Church Fathers held divergent views on infant baptism, reflecting the theological tensions of their era. Augustine of Hippo, in his anti-Pelagian writings, maintained that baptism was essential for cleansing original sin, asserting that only through this sacrament could infants be incorporated into Christ's flock. He issued grave warnings about the eternal consequences of dying unbaptized.[38] In contrast, Gregory of Nazianzus adopted a more moderate position, arguing that since infants lack awareness of sin or grace, baptism should be deferred unless imminent danger threatened their lives - suggesting age three as an appropriate minimum or when children could actively participate in the rite.[38] Jerome took a decidedly proactive stance, particularly in his correspondence with Laeta (403 AD), where he framed infant baptism as a fundamental parental obligation, implying negligence in those who delayed the sacrament. These differing perspectives illustrate the evolving theology surrounding baptismal practices in early Christianity.[38]

According to Robin M. Jensen (2012), archaeological evidence supports the existence of diverse baptismal practices in early Christianity. The variation in baptismal font designs suggests differences in liturgical customs, while third- and fourth-century funerary inscriptions confirm that some infants received emergency baptisms - though these do not demonstrate it was a widespread norm.[38] The interpretation of iconographic evidence remains contested, as depictions of small figures undergoing baptism could represent either the baptism of Jesus or early instances of infant baptism.[38] This ambiguity in material evidence mirrors the theological diversity seen in textual sources from the period.

Fifth century

[edit]
Medieval era miniature of an infant being baptized in a Baptismal font

By the late fifth century, theological debates increasingly emphasized original sin as the primary justification for infant baptism. The growing influence of Augustinian theology in Western Christianity found formal expression when the Council of Carthage (418 AD) affirmed that infants, while personally guiltless, bore the taint of Adam's original sin and consequently needed baptism for spiritual purification. This doctrinal development marked a significant shift in sacramental theology, transforming infant baptism from a discretionary practice to a theological necessity in Western Christian thought.[44]

By the early sixth century, a growing emphasis on the doctrine of repeatable penance further heightened fears that unbaptized infants would suffer eternal damnation. This period saw a shift in practice: parents began engaging in formal baptismal preparation activities on behalf of their children. Over time, these preparations gave way to a consolidated ceremony, where newborn infants were baptised, anointed (confirmation), and received communion all at once to ensure that even the youngest members of the community were promptly incorporated into the salvific rite.[44] Writings from such as John the Deacon’s letter (c. 500 AD) highlight that the Church’s teaching and practice had firmly established infant baptism as essential for salvation in response to original sin.[44] Large fonts from this period indicate that adult baptism continued alongside infant baptism well into the sixth and seventh centuries.[38] In the sixth century, 526 AD, eastern Roman emperor, Justinian I made infant baptism compulsory.[38]

Middle ages

[edit]

The practice of infant baptism expanded significantly during the early Middle Ages, particularly from the sixth century onward, largely due to concerns about high infant mortality rates. This led to the frequent administration of emergency baptisms (baptism in extremis), often performed in respite sanctuaries. The sacrament became firmly established as a normative practice through the Carolingian reforms of the ninth century, and was further consolidated during the Gregorian reforms of the eleventh and twelfth centuries.[46]

Denominations teachings & practices

[edit]

Roman Catholic

[edit]
Further information: Baptism § Catholicism

The Catholic Church requires a "founded hope" the child will be raised Catholic for licit baptism (Code of Canon Law 868 §1, 2° CIC). If absent, baptism is postponed (not denied) with explanation. The sacrament grants regeneration, removes original sin, and unites the child with Christ.[47] Therefore, baptism is a fundamental sacrament in the Church, marking the initiation of an individual into Christian life and the Church community. It is essential for salvation, providing spiritual rebirth and access to other sacraments.[47]

The Church requires assurance that baptized infants will be raised Catholic (Canon 868 §1, 2° CIC). Parental consent is mandatory - at least one parent/guardian must approve. Baptism cannot be administered against parental wishes except in danger of death, when it may proceed regardless of objections.[47] Additionally, baptism is seen as a one-time sacrament that marks a person’s commitment to Christ and cannot be repeated. If there is serious doubt about whether someone was baptized before or if it was done correctly, the Catholic Church allows a conditional baptism to be performed. Moreover, the practice of baptizing miscarried or stillborn infants is no longer done.[48]

The Church recognizes both pouring (affusion) and immersion as valid baptismal methods, stating that the symbolic cleansing is preserved through the ritual use of water, even when full immersion isn't practiced.[48]

The Church acknowledges the importance of a personal decision in baptism, which infants cannot make. To address this, godparents are appointed to stand in for the child, committing to their Christian upbringing on behalf of the parents. The role of parents and godparents is strongly emphasized in the Church’s rite of infant baptism, first introduced in 1969 and later revised. As they grow, baptized children are expected to embrace the faith chosen for them, confirming the decision made on their behalf.[48]

Historically, such practices were developed gradually, rooted in early Christian tradition, original sin, and sacramental theology. While adult baptism was initially dominant, the practice of baptizing infants became common by the third century. Cyprian of Carthage (c. 250 AD) defended it, arguing that baptismal grace should not be denied to children.[49] In the fourth century, Augustine of Hippo linked baptism to original sin, asserting that it was necessary for salvation. His arguments shaped medieval sacramental theology, which emphasized that baptism remained valid regardless of personal faith (ex opere operato).[49] The concept of limbo (limbus infantium), a speculative idea that unbaptized infants neither enter heaven nor suffer in hell, was never official Church doctrine. Though widely held from the 12th century onward, belief in limbo had largely faded by the 20th century.[48]

In-response to Protestant critiques, the Council of Trent (1545–1563) firmly upheld infant baptism as obligatory, solidifying its standard practice with support from godparents and catechesis. Today, the Church teaches that unbaptized infants are entrusted to God’s mercy, while maintaining that baptism remains essential for initiation into the faith and liberation from original sin.[49]

Eastern Churches

[edit]
Baptism by immersion in the Eastern Orthodox Church (Sophia Cathedral, 2005)

The Eastern Orthodox Church practices infant baptism as a fundamental part of its sacramental theology, viewing it as the child's initiation into the Church and participation in the life of Jesus.[50] The baptism is performed through triple immersion in water, symbolizing the believer’s sharing in Christ’s death and resurrection.[50] In Orthodox theology, sacraments are considered effective by the very act of their completion (ex opere operato), meaning they impart divine grace regardless of the recipient’s personal understanding.[51]

The Orthodox Church, like the Roman Catholic Church, believes that baptism results in the forgiveness of sins, both original and actual. Through baptism, the newly baptized is "clothed with Christ" and becomes a full member of the Church.[51] The sacrament is viewed as a mystical communion with God, through which grace is given for salvation and spiritual transformation. This understanding reflects the Orthodox belief that sacraments are "Mysteries", divine means by which humanity experiences salvation and anticipates eternal life in God’s kingdom.[51]

Baptism in the Orthodox Church is immediately followed by Chrismation (Confirmation) and Holy Communion, emphasizing the unity of these three sacraments.[50] Chrismation, administered by the priest, involves anointing the baptized with Holy Myron (Chrism), sealing them with the gift of the Holy Spirit. The newly baptized, including infants, then receive the Eucharist, partaking in consecrated wine and bread as their first communion.[50] This integrated approach contrasts with many Western Christian traditions, where these sacraments are administered separately at different stages of life.

The baptism of infants is performed on the basis of the faith of the Church, rather than the personal profession of the child.[50] The commitment of parents and godparents plays a crucial role, as they pledge to raise the child in the Orthodox faith. While infants are traditionally baptized on the eighth day, mirroring the Old Testament practice of circumcision, this timing is not strictly required, and baptisms may occur at any time.[52] Orthodox theology holds that baptism is essential for salvation and the remission of original sin, making it a vital sacrament in the life of every Orthodox Christian.[53]

Protestant

[edit]

Lutheran Churches

[edit]
Baptism of a child in Finland by a Lutheran pastor (2015)

Lutherans uphold infant baptism by pointing to scriptural references where entire households were baptized (e.g., Acts 16:15). They argue that households in biblical times included children​. According to Martin Luther, baptism is not founded on personal faith, as one can never be certain of faith. Instead, it is based on God's word and commandment. The faith involved is that of those who bring the child to baptism (fides aliena), such as parents, godparents, and the church congregation.[54]

Lutherans believe that through baptism, the child receives infused faith, mediated by the prayers of the church, parents, and godparents. Baptism purifies and renews the child. Personal faith is not a prerequisite for baptism but is nourished by it, as the individual continually adheres to God's grace and renounces sin throughout life. The Augsburg Confession (II) states that baptism is necessary for salvation. It is an assignment to Christ, a surrender into Jesus’ death and resurrection, and a gift of new life that calls the baptized to walk in faith.[54]

While baptism marks initiation into the church and incorporation into the people of God, it is viewed as the beginning of a lifelong journey. If not taken in faith, baptism remains incomplete. In the post-Reformation era, Lutheran orthodoxy reaffirmed the necessity of infant baptism. However, later movements such as Pietism and Rationalism emphasized inner experience over the sacrament, leading figures like John Wesley to argue that true rebirth occurs through personal transformation, not the outward ritual​.[54]

Methodist

[edit]
Presbyterian-Congregational Alliance (1770–1852)

According to Campbell (1999), Methodist churches affirm infant baptism, rooted in the seventeenth Article of Religion’s instruction to retain “the baptism of young children” (p. 107). Methodists have historically defended this practice against critics of infant baptism, grounding it in New Testament accounts of household baptisms (Acts 16:15, 33), Jesus’ embrace of children (e.g., Matthew 19:13–15), and the belief that all, including infants, require inclusion in the church’s covenantal fellowship.[55] For Methodists, infant baptism signifies “an acceptance of the prevenient grace of God and as a confession on the part of the church of its responsibility for children in general and for every child in particular.”[56][57] Methodist doctrine further emphasizes that justifying grace, essential for salvation, is received after repentance and a personal commitment to Christ as Savior.[58][59] While many Methodist denominations, such as the Free Methodist Church and Allegheny Wesleyan Methodist Connection, practice infant baptism for families who request it, they also offer a rite of child dedication for those who prefer to delay baptism until their child can consciously profess faith.[59][60]

Presbyterian, Congregational and Reformed Churches

[edit]

Presbyterian, Congregational, and Reformed churches administer infant baptism based on covenant theology, viewing baptism as "a sign and seal of the covenant of grace" and the "visible Word of God" (Fesko 2010, p. 4). They argue that baptism replaces circumcision as the covenant sign and that just as infants were circumcised under the old covenant, so now infants should be baptized under the new covenant (p. 8). Baptism is not merely a human act of profession but is "God’s visible covenant promise when accompanied by the Word" and serves as a "means of grace" (p. 6). This perspective stresses that baptism is grounded in "God’s covenant dealings with His people," not in an individual’s decision or personal faith alone (p. 3).[61][62]

Confirmation

[edit]

For Catholic, Methodist Christians, and Wesleyan, Confirmation "strengthens" (the original meaning of the word "confirm")[63][64] the grace of Baptism, by conferring an increase and deepening of that grace.[65][64]

In Eastern Christianity, including the Eastern Catholic Churches, the sacrament of Confirmation is conferred immediately after baptism, and there is no renewal of baptismal promises. In the Latin Church and its Latin liturgical rites of the Catholic Church, the sacrament is to be conferred at about the age of discretion (generally taken to be about 7), unless the Episcopal Conference has decided on a different age, or there is danger of death or, in the judgment of the minister, a grave reason suggests otherwise (canon 891 of the Code of Canon Law). The renewal of baptismal promises by those receiving the sacrament in the Western Catholic Church is incidental to the rite and not essentially different from the solemn renewal of their baptismal promises that is asked of all members of this church each year at the Easter Vigil service. Only in French-speaking countries has there been a development of ceremonies, quite distinct from the sacrament of Confirmation, for young Catholics to profess their faith publicly, in line with their age.[66]

Within the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, confirmation or "the laying on of hands" is an essential part of the baptismal ordinance, and to receive baptism without confirmation is to leave the ordinance incomplete.[67] Confirmation is the conferring of the gift of the Holy Ghost as a constant companion.[68] To confirm means to "make more sure" and the ordinance of confirmation stands as a witness of the individual becoming a member of the LDS Church and not just an acceptance of Jesus.[67]

Comparison with believer’s baptism

[edit]

Definition of believer’s baptism

[edit]

Believer’s baptism emphasizes conscious faith and personal commitment as prerequisites. Advocates argue that household baptisms in Acts (e.g., Acts 16:15, 33) cited for infant baptism rely on an argument from silence, as no explicit biblical text mentions infant baptism. Historical records suggest infant baptism emerged in the late second century, lacking direct scriptural precedent.[69] Rooted in Pauline theology (Romans 6:4; Galatians 3:27), baptism symbolizes the burial of the “old self” and resurrection to new life in Christ through immersion. Groups like the Adventists view it as a public declaration of repentance and surrender to Christ’s lordship. Swiss Reformer Huldrych Zwingli emphasized baptism as a memorial act, not a sacramental means of grace.[69]

Key theological differences

[edit]

Believer’s baptism prioritizes responsible baptism, requiring the baptized to become competent to know Christ. It is effective only when joined with faith and presupposes that baptized can respond for themselves to the baptismal interrogations and thus bear witness to personal faith.[70] However, infant baptism primarily rests on God’s initiative, viewing baptism as a sign of grace and covenant membership, not requiring personal faith but depending on the church’s faith.[70]

Debates regarding infant baptism

[edit]

The debate over infant baptism engages ecclesiology, covenant, and faith, often sparking controversy. Tom J. Nettles et al. (2007) in Understanding Four Views on Baptism highlight two irreconcilable traditions: believer’s baptism, emphasizing personal faith, and infant baptism, prioritizing covenantal continuity. These frameworks “simply cannot be mixed” without undermining theological integrity (p. 21)[71]

Arguments for

[edit]

Proponents of infant baptism base their position on a covenantal framework, equating the practice with the Old Testament rite of circumcision. In Reformed theology, baptism signifies a child’s inclusion in God’s covenant community and membership within the visible church, mirroring circumcision’s role in ancient Israel.[72] B. B. Warfield noted this continuity, arguing that God’s inclusion of children in the covenant community, established during Abraham’s time, still grants them access to church membership and sacraments.[72] Luther defended infant baptism as an act of obedience to Christ’s directive to bring children to God, grounding the practice in divine authority rather than human choice.[73]

Arguments against

[edit]

Critics of infant baptism maintain that the New Testament portrays baptism reserved for individuals who consciously respond to the gospel and profess faith, rather than as a covenantal rite applied to infants.[74] They state that the absence of explicit biblical examples where baptism is administered to those incapable of understanding or articulating belief, therefore weakens its symbolic role in affirming Christian identity.[75]

As for the historical viewpoint, critics argue that infant baptism originated as a post-apostolic ecclesiastical innovation, lacking direct biblical or apostolic authorization, and dismiss it as a human tradition unsupported by divine revelation.[76]

Regarding consent, Mary McAleese, a Catholic legal scholar and former Irish president, posits in her doctoral research that infant baptism functions as “enforced membership” within the Catholic Church, raising questions about consent and lifelong obligations imposed on children. She suggests that baptized individuals should later have the opportunity to formally affirm or renounce their membership, aligning with modern principles of freedom of conscience, belief, and religion. McAleese observes that the Catholic Church has yet to fully integrate these principles into its sacramental theology.[77]

Opposing denominations

[edit]

These doctrinal positions shape baptismal practices across Christian traditions, exemplified by: Anabaptists (e.g., Mennonites, Amish), Baptist Traditions (Southern, Reformed), Churches of Christ, Pentecostal/Charismatic groups (Assemblies of God, Oneness Pentecostals). Additionally, several nontrinitarian religious groups also oppose infant baptism, including Oneness Pentecostals, Christadelphians, Jehovah's Witnesses, United Church of God, and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS).[78]

Specifically, the LDS Church has stated that little children are considered both born without sin[79] and incapable of committing sin.[80] They have no need of baptism until age eight,[81] when they can begin to learn to discern right from wrong, and are thus accountable to God for their own actions.[82] However, the LDS Church performs a non-saving ordinance to name and bless children, customarily performed on infants.[83]

Challenges & controversies

[edit]

Injury and death

[edit]

Baptisms have sometimes accidentally led to injuries, or deaths, such as drowning deaths, to babies.[84][85] In Romania, this has served as an opportunity to revise practices.[86]

Other religious traditions

[edit]

Yazidism

[edit]
Baptism of a Yazidi child in Lalish

In Yazidism, Mor kirin ("to seal") is a baptism ritual typically performed at birth to initiate children into the faith. Holy water from the Kaniya Sipî (White Spring) at Lalish, the holiest Yazidi site.[87][88] Alternatively, one may use the slightly less holy Zimzim spring.

Individuals originating from regions near Lalish frequently translate the mor kirin ceremony as 'baptism,' due to its observable similarities with Christian baptismal rites.[87]

The rite is performed by either a male or female member of a shaikh or pir family who serves as the officiating Mijêwir (custodian) at Lalish, specifically holding the position of Micêwirê Kaniya Sipî (custodian of the White Spring) during the ceremony.[87]

The officiant pours holy water from one of Lalish's sacred springs over the child's head in three ritual motions. While the ideal age for reception is nine or ten years, practical considerations often lead to earlier administration. Although circumcision is not a religious requirement, some families observe the practice due to regional customs.[89]

According to Iraqi Yazidi tradition, individuals who die without undergoing mor kirin must be ritually washed by their shaikh, pir, or designated "Brother/Sister of the Hereafter" (Kurd. Birayê/Xuşka Axiretê). If none of these are available, another person may perform the washing in their name. For those unable to travel to Lalish, the rite may be conducted using holy water transported from the sacred springs of Lalish to their location.[87]

However, adherence to this practice varies geographically. Yazidis originating from areas near Lalish observe the custom more consistently than those from Turkey or Armenia, among whom the ritual has largely diminished in perceived necessity.[87]

While the mor kirin ceremony may reflect historical Christian influences, its origins remain speculative. Given the significance of water in pre-Islamic Iranian religions, the rite could equally stem from earlier indigenous traditions.[87]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c Brasher, B. (Ed.). (2001). Encyclopedia of fundamentalism: Volume 3 of religion & society (p. 47). Berkshire Publishing Group.
  2. ^ Provance, B. S. (2010). Pocket Dictionary of Liturgy & Worship. United States: InterVarsity Press. "Infant baptism is practiced by the [Anglican Communion], [Lutheran Church], [Presbyterian & Reformed Churches], [Roman Catholic Church], and [Methodist Church] churches, often followed by a later rite of *confirmation or profession of faith (Confessional statements: Aug. Conf. 9; Heid. Cat. 74; West. Conf. 28.4; CCC 1250-52; cf. Calvin, Institutes 4.16)" (p. 26).
  3. ^ Canon Law Society of America. (2000). New commentary on the Code of Canon Law (J. A. Coriden, J. P. Beal, & T. J. Green, Eds.). Paulist Press. p. 1054.
  4. ^ Cuneo, T. (2014). Transforming the self: On the baptismal rite. Religious Studies, 50(3), 279–296. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43658441
  5. ^ Gassmann, G. (2001). Historical dictionary of Lutheranism (J. Woronoff, Series Ed.). Scarecrow Press. (pp. 34-35).
  6. ^ "Christening FAQs". The Church of England. Retrieved 28 April 2025.
  7. ^ Anglican Church in North America. (2020). To be a Christian: An Anglican catechism. Crossway. (p. 57)
  8. ^ Foster, D. A. (Ed.). (2004). The Encyclopedia of the Stone-Campbell Movement. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. p. 249.
  9. ^ Benedict, D. (2009, December 9). What is the appropriate age for baptism and for confirmation? Discipleship Ministries. https://www.umcdiscipleship.org/resources/what-is-the-appropriate-age-for-baptism-and-for-confirmation
  10. ^ a b c d e f Johnson, M. E. (2007). The rites of Christian initiation: Their evolution and interpretation (2nd rev. & expanded ed., pp. 402–448). Liturgical Press.
  11. ^ a b c d e Cuneo, T. (2014). Transforming the self: on the baptismal rite. Religious Studies, 50(3), 279–296. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43658441
  12. ^ Lawson, K. E. (2011). Baptismal theology and practices and the spiritual nurture of children: Part I: early and medieval church. Christian Education Journal, 8(1), 130+. "Though hotly debated, it is unclear whether or not children in the church during the New Testament era were baptized. Examples shared in the Bible generally either focus on adult believers receiving baptism" (p. 131).
  13. ^ Livingstone, E. A. (Ed.). (2006). The concise Oxford dictionary of the Christian church. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780199659623.001.0001 "Although from the first baptism was the universal means of entry into the Christian community, the NT [New Testament] contains no specific authority for its administration to infants" (Livingstone, 2006, p. 94).
  14. ^ McMaken, W. T. (2013). The Sign of the Gospel: Toward an Evangelical Doctrine of Infant Baptism After Karl Barth. United States: Fortress Press. "While some claim to find traces of infant baptism in the New Testament, the scholarly consensus is that no clear, indisputable evidence of the practice is present. On the other hand, there is likewise no clear, indisputable evidence that infant baptism did not occur in the earliest Christian communities" (p.14).
  15. ^ Douglas, J. D., Toon, P. (2023). The Concise Dictionary of the Christian Tradition: Doctrine, Liturgy, History. United States: Zondervan. "Though there are no explicit statements that babies were baptized in the apostolic period, proponents of infant baptism see it as highly probable that they wereincluded in the households which were baptized (Acts 16:15, 31)" (p. 47-48).
  16. ^ Kärkkäinen, V. (2021). An Introduction to Ecclesiology: Historical, Global, and Interreligious Perspectives. United Kingdom: IVP Academic. "In light of current scholarship, it is clear that infant baptism was a new development in relation to the New Testament and the earliest patristic theology. It emerged slowly and sporadically in various Christian locations; its legitimacy had to be demonstrated (Origen) and was sometimes outright rejected (Tertullian). This momentous shift developed gradually from the end of the second century. Not earlier than the end of the fourth and beginning of the fifth century, infant baptism established itself as the main mode of baptism. For the first five centuries of Christian history, believers' baptism and infant baptism coexisted" (p. 212).
  17. ^ Harper's Encyclopedia of Religious Education. (1990). United Kingdom: Harper & Row. "In addition, the spread of infant baptism, which began to take root in the third century, contributed to the disappearance of the catechumenate" (p. 104)
  18. ^ Johnson, M.  (2018, April 26). The Development of the “Apostolic Tradition” in Early Christian Worship. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion. Retrieved 28 Apr. 2025, from https://oxfordre.com/religion/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.001.0001/acrefore-9780199340378-e-526. "Along with these specific ritual details, 3rd-century sources also show that infant baptism, including infant communion, was being practiced widely. Indeed, it was considered a normative practice in many early Christian communities."
  19. ^ Gassmann, G., Larson, D. H., Oldenburg, M. W. (2001). Historical Dictionary of Lutheranism. United States: Scarecrow Press. "...the catechumenate, fell out of use as infant baptism, attested around the year 200, became universal in the fourth and fifth centuries. Following the foundational teaching of Augustine that in baptism guilt and original sin are remitted, in 418 the Synod of Carthage decreed that infants must be baptized in order to be freed from original sin" (p. 34).
  20. ^ a b Nicoletti, S. A. (2015, November 1). Infant baptism in the first-century presupposition pool. Tyndale Bulletin, 66(2). https://doi.org/10.53751/001c.29399
  21. ^ Lynch, J. H. (2019). Godparents and Kinship in Early Medieval Europe. United States: Princeton University Press. "In 1938, and in a revised edition of 1958, Joachim Jeremias published a work challenging the scholarly consensus that held infant baptism to be unattested in the New Testament or in second-century Christian sources" (p. 117).
  22. ^ a b Wright, D. F. (2007). Infant baptism in historical perspective: Collected studies. (p. 20). Wipf and Stock Publishers.
  23. ^ a b c Wright, David F. (2005). "The Apostolic Fathers and Infant Baptism: Any Advance on the Obscurity of the New Testament?". Trajectories Through the New Testament and the Apostolic Fathers. pp. 123–134. doi:10.1093/oso/9780199267835.003.0008. ISBN 978-0-19-926783-5.
  24. ^ a b Strange, W. A. (1996). Children in the early church: Children in the ancient world, the New Testament and the early church. Wipf & Stock, p. 123.
  25. ^ a b Jeremias, J. (2004). Infant baptism in the first four centuries. Wipf & Stock Publishers. pp. 20-22.
  26. ^ a b c Dyrness, William A.; Kärkkäinen, Veli-Matti, eds. (2009). Global Dictionary of Theology: A Resource for the Worldwide Church. InterVarsity Press. p. 99. ISBN 978-0-8308-7811-6.
  27. ^ a b c d e f Bakke 2005, pp. 224–227.
  28. ^ Ferguson, E. (2009). Baptism in the early church: History, theology, and liturgy in the first five centuries. Eerdmans. pp. 78–80.
  29. ^ Aland 2004, pp. 54–57.
  30. ^ Boaheng, I., & Twumasi-Ankrah, E. (2024). Exegetical and theological analysis of Psalm 51:1-12. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 7(1), 504–517. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v7i1.1962
  31. ^ Jefford, C. N. (1989). The sayings of Jesus in the Teaching of the Twelve Apostles. Brill. pp. 87-88.
  32. ^ Ferguson, E. (1979, April). Inscriptions and the origin of infant baptism. The Journal of Theological Studies, 30(1), 37–46.
  33. ^ a b Aland 2004, p. 10.
  34. ^ a b c d Ferguson, Everett (1999). Early Christians Speak: Faith and Life in the First Three Centuries (3 ed.). ACU Press. p. 58. ISBN 978-0-89112-045-2. JSTOR j.ctv1k3nq1f.
  35. ^ Yılmaz, Nuh (30 June 2020). "Tertullian's Understanding of Baptism". Amasya İlahiyat Dergisi (14): 375–402. doi:10.18498/amailad.693914.
  36. ^ a b Nelson, M. E. (25 June 1996). "Catechesis and baptism in the early Christian church". In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi. 30 (4). doi:10.4102/ids.v30i4.1588.
  37. ^ Meyers, Ruth A. (1988). "Infant Communion: Reflections on the Case from Tradition". Anglican and Episcopal History. 57 (2): 159–175. JSTOR 42610259.
  38. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Jensen, Robin M. (2012). "Material and Documentary Evidence for the Practice of Early Christian Baptism". Journal of Early Christian Studies. 20 (3): 371–405. doi:10.1353/earl.2012.0019. Project MUSE 485368 ProQuest 1081167146.
  39. ^ The Shepherd of Hermas, Similitude 9, Chapter 29, verses 1–3 (Sim. 9.29.1–3).
  40. ^ a b Ferguson, Everett (1999). "The Beginning of Infant Baptism". Early Christians Speak (3 ed.). ACU Press. pp. 53–64. ISBN 978-0-89112-045-2. JSTOR j.ctv1k3nq1f.8.
  41. ^ Bakke 2005, pp. 56–60.
  42. ^ a b c Messmer, Andrew (19 December 2022). "Infant Dedication in the Early Church: Texts, Commentary, and Present-Day Application". Journal of European Baptist Studies: 61–89 Pages. doi:10.25782/jebs.v22i2.1064.
  43. ^ Ferguson, Everett (1979). "Inscriptions and the Origin of Infant Baptism". The Journal of Theological Studies. XXX (1): 37–46. doi:10.1093/jts/XXX.1.37.
  44. ^ a b c d Lawson, Kevin E. (May 2011). "Baptismal Theology and Practices and the Spiritual Nurture of Children Part I: Early and Medieval Church". Christian Education Journal: Research on Educational Ministry. 8 (1): 130–145. doi:10.1177/073989131100800109.
  45. ^ Vorachek, William R.; Pearson, William R.; Rule, Gordon S. (1991). "Cloning, Expression, and Characterization of a Class-Mu Glutathione Transferase from Human Muscle, the Product of the GST4 Locus". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 88 (10): 4443–4447. Bibcode:1991PNAS...88.4443V. doi:10.1073/pnas.88.10.4443. JSTOR 2357061. PMC 51676. PMID 2034681.
  46. ^ "La protection spirituelle au Moyen Âge". Cahiers de Recherches Médiévales (8). 2001. doi:10.4000/crm.376.
  47. ^ a b c Jakubiak, T. (2018). The Founded Hope that an Infant will be Brought up in the Catholic Religion as a Condition for Baptism. Studia canonica, 52(2), 491-508.
  48. ^ a b c d "Roman Catholicism - Baptism, Sacraments, Faith | Britannica". www.britannica.com. 5 March 2025. Retrieved 5 March 2025.
  49. ^ a b c Johnson, M. E. (1999). Baptismal" Spirituality" in the Early Church and Its Implications for the Church Today. pp. 188-211.
  50. ^ a b c d e Heller, D. (2023). Baptism. In B. N. Wolfe et al. (Eds.), St Andrews Encyclopaedia of Theology. Retrieved March 5, 2025, from https://www.saet.ac.uk/Christianity/Baptism. pp.13-14.
  51. ^ a b c House, H. W. (2000). Baptism for the forgiveness of sins: Sign, seal, or means of grace? (Part 1). Christian Research Journal, 22(2), 1–33.
  52. ^ John Henry Parker; et al. (1844). "The Epistles of S. Cyprian, with the Council of Carthage, on the Baptism". Oxford, London. Retrieved 12 December 2014.
  53. ^ Ware, K. (1993). The Orthodox Church: An introduction to Eastern Christianity (p. 284). Penguin UK.
  54. ^ a b c (Heller, 2023, pp. 10-15)
  55. ^ Campbell, T. A. (1999). Methodist doctrine: The essentials. Abingdon Press. (pp. 73-133)
  56. ^ Methodist Review, Volume 101. G. Lane & P. B. Sandford. 1918. p. 464.
  57. ^ Manns, Peter; Meyer, Harding (1984). Luther's Ecumenical Significance: An Interconfessional Consultation. Fortress Press. p. 141. ISBN 978-0-8006-1747-9. When modern Methodists expound infant baptism, they think first of " prevenient grace", for which infant baptism is said to be an effective, or at least a useful, sign.
  58. ^ "God's Preparing, Accepting, and Sustaining Grace". The United Methodist Church GBGM. Archived from the original on 9 January 2008. Retrieved 2 August 2007.
  59. ^ a b "Baptism and Dedication". Free Methodist Church. 3 December 2008. When they baptize babies, pastors should make sure that their prayers include clear requests that God will bring the children to a personal faith that "owns" what the parents are promising at a time when the children (who "belong" from day one) cannot act for themselves. And when they dedicate children, pastors should make sure that their prayers include clear gratitude to God for the fact that he is already at work in the life of that child, who already "belongs" in the Christian community. Here's what must be stressed: whether at the time of baptism (in the adult baptism tradition) or at the time of confirmation when the vows made earlier by the parents are personally "owned" (in the infant baptism tradition), it is faith in Jesus (dependent trust, not mere cognitive affirmation) that is crucial. Paul goes so far as to say that without faith and obedience, the old rite of circumcision has no value (Romans 2:25). The same is true of baptism. With either rite, clear evangelistic follow-through is crucial.
  60. ^ The Discipline of the Allegheny Wesleyan Methodist Connection (Original Allegheny Conference). Salem: Allegheny Wesleyan Methodist Connection. 2014. pp. 140–146.
  61. ^ Fesko, J. V. (2010). Word, water, and Spirit: A Reformed perspective on baptism. Reformation Heritage Books.
  62. ^ Westminster Confession, Chapter 28, Section 1 and especially section 3. Baptized people are considered part of the covenant of grace by faith unless they prove otherwise by committing apostasy.
  63. ^ "Bartleby.com: Great Books Online -- Quotes, Poems, Novels, Classics and hundreds more". www.bartleby.com. Archived from the original on 17 April 2008.
  64. ^ a b "Baptism and Confirmation". The Methodist Church in Britain. 2014. Archived from the original on 7 July 2017. Retrieved 23 July 2017.
  65. ^ "Catechism". www.usccb.org.
  66. ^ cf. article Archived 24 December 2007 at the Wayback Machine entitled Redonner tout son sens à l'initiation chrétienne : un défi à relever in Lumière et Vie 270 (June 2006), proposing the establishment of as many as seven such occasions.
  67. ^ a b Craven, Rulon G. (1992). "Confirmation". In Ludlow, Daniel H (ed.). Encyclopedia of Mormonism. New York: Macmillan Publishing. pp. 310–311. ISBN 0-02-879602-0. OCLC 24502140.
  68. ^ Porter, Bruce Douglas (1992). "Gift of the Holy Ghost". In Ludlow, Daniel H (ed.). Encyclopedia of Mormonism. New York: Macmillan Publishing. pp. 543–544. ISBN 0-02-879602-0. OCLC 24502140.
  69. ^ a b (Nettles et al., 2007, pp. 170-171)
  70. ^ a b McMaken, W.T. (2013). The Sign of the Gospel: Toward an Evangelical Doctrine of Infant Baptism after Karl Barth. Augsburg Fortress Publishers. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/27359. (pp. 8-57).
  71. ^ Nettles, T. J., Pratt, R. L., Jr., Kolb, R., & Castelein, J. D. (2007). Understanding four views on baptism. Zondervan.
  72. ^ a b (Nettles et al., 2007, p. 70)
  73. ^ (Nettles et al., 2007, p. 124)
  74. ^ (Nettles et al., 2007, p. 40)
  75. ^ (Nettles et al., 2007, p. 111)
  76. ^ (Nettles et al., 2007, p. 198)
  77. ^ McGarry, Patsy (22 June 2018). "Infant Baptism is enforced membership of the Catholic Church, says Mary McAleese". The Irish Times. Retrieved 16 December 2018.
  78. ^ Norman, Keith E. (1992). "Infant Baptism". In Ludlow, Daniel H (ed.). Encyclopedia of Mormonism. New York: Macmillan Publishing. pp. 682–683. ISBN 0-02-879602-0. OCLC 24502140.
  79. ^ Merrill, Byron R. (1992). "Original sin". In Ludlow, Daniel H (ed.). Encyclopedia of Mormonism. New York: Macmillan Publishing. pp. 1052–1053. ISBN 0-02-879602-0. OCLC 24502140.
  80. ^ Rudd, Calvin P. (1992). "Children: Salvation of Children". In Ludlow, Daniel H (ed.). Encyclopedia of Mormonism. New York: Macmillan Publishing. pp. 268–269. ISBN 0-02-879602-0. OCLC 24502140.
  81. ^ Hawkins, Carl S. (1992). "Baptism". In Ludlow, Daniel H (ed.). Encyclopedia of Mormonism. New York: Macmillan Publishing. pp. 92–94. ISBN 0-02-879602-0. OCLC 24502140.
  82. ^ Warner, C. Terry (1992). "Accountability". In Ludlow, Daniel H (ed.). Encyclopedia of Mormonism. New York: Macmillan Publishing. p. 13. ISBN 0-02-879602-0. OCLC 24502140.
  83. ^ Bangerter, Lowell (1992), "Children: Blessing of Children", in Ludlow, Daniel H (ed.), Encyclopedia of Mormonism, New York: Macmillan Publishing, p. 268, ISBN 0-02-879602-0, OCLC 24502140
  84. ^ Tasos Kokkinidis (20 October 2020). "Greek Orthodox Priest is Accused of Injuring Baby During Baptism". Greek Reporter. Retrieved 7 February 2021.
  85. ^ AFP (4 February 2021). "Orthodox Church under fire in Romania after baby dies following baptism". The Guardian. Retrieved 6 February 2021.
  86. ^ Stephen McGrath (5 February 2021). "Romania baptisms: Six-week-old baby's death sparks calls for change". BBC News. Retrieved 6 February 2021.
  87. ^ a b c d e f Kreyenbroek, P. G. (2005). Yazidis ii. Initiation in Yazidism. Encyclopædia Iranica. Retrieved April 28, 2025, from http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/yazidis-ii-initiation-in-yazidism
  88. ^ Kreyenbroek, Philip G. (2009). Yezidism in Europe: Different Generations Speak about Their Religion. Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. ISBN 978-3-447-06060-8.
  89. ^ Parry, O. H. (Oswald Hutton) (1895). "Six months in a Syrian monastery; being the record of a visit to the head quarters of the Syrian church in Mesopotamia, with some account of the Yazidis or devil worshipers of Mosul and El Jilwah, their sacred book". London : H. Cox.

Sources

[edit]
  • Aland, Kurt (2004). Did the Early Church Baptize Infants?. Wipf and Stock Publishers. ISBN 978-1-59244-541-7.
  • Bakke, Odd Magne (2005). When Children Became People: The Birth of Childhood in Early Christianity. Fortress Press. ISBN 978-1-4514-1530-8.
[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Infant baptism.

Support

[edit]

Opposition

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Infant_baptism&oldid=1287880906"